Comments on: Air Crash Investigation: Air France Flight 296 Part 1

By: mikehanoo33

mikehanoo33 — Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:51:42 +0000

@TheAdler83 Ya wanna know what happened , its called the slimy oil companies , they buy out and suppress anyone that will infringe upon there little ol phrofit margin , these sick slimy crimanals are now killing are planet on a massive scale and most people are still NOT demading that clean technology be promoted !

By: hotmichael3358

hotmichael3358 — Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:33:18 +0000

Even if the air car is only used on a limited basis in town it could still be a part of the solution . anything but petroleum products !

By: Topazman12

Topazman12 — Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:21 +0000

After all these years, are they saying that Japan is building this car while North America does nothing but offer bail outs?

By: fizzguts

fizzguts — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:57:05 +0000

@Topazman12
In the ONLY published test it went FIVE miles. End of story. The 100km range is a BULLSHIT claim by MDI.
But hey find an independent test confirming MDI’s lies opps claims and I’ll sing their praises.
Hello?
Silence?
Sigh tards and fwits

By: Voxson1

Voxson1 — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:01:37 +0000

@mikehanoo33 More accurately what happened was that the technology couldn’t deliver on its manufacturers claims, hence it didn’t make it to production. I think most people are aware that the oil company conspiracy is a sham made up by people who enjoy putting across these conspiracy theories despite there not being a shred of evidence to support their claims. One person says “it’s all becuase of a conspiracy” and the rest just follow along like dumb idiots.

By: mikehanoo33

mikehanoo33 — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:46:28 +0000

@Voxson1 Not a shred of evidence , are you high , we could fill many books with the evidence against the oil companies , have you seen “who killed the electric car” ? Are you aware of chevron texaco buying the NIMH battery from GM and then suing Toyota for using it in there rav 4 back in 2003 ? Still they will not allow the larger NIMH batteries to be used . This is just one small part of there corrupt ways .

By: mikehanoo33

mikehanoo33 — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:41:45 +0000

As far as the air car is concerned , from my research it feels like the idea was over hyped and people made untrue statements about the range , this does not discount all the other viable working alternative energy systems such as bio fuels and electric , which are much cleaner then petroleum products , its time to end the dirty toxic oil game !

By: Voxson1

Voxson1 — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:12:14 +0000

@mikehanoo33 I am not saying that oil companies are not at all responsible for the demise of some of these ideas, the NIMH and chevron texaco has credible supporting evidence. However it seems these conspiracy theorists will “automatically default” to it’s the fault of the oil company whenever some scam idea doesn’t hit the market. The air car and HHO electrolysis cells are ideas which in reality do not work to deliver on their promise, it’s not oil company suppression as is being put across.

By: hotmichael3358

hotmichael3358 — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:12:22 +0000

The french government owns the oil company of France and the Renault factory making the air car , no conflict of interest there .

By: mikehanoo33

mikehanoo33 — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:22:53 +0000

The H. K. Porter Compound Air Locomotives, 1896-1930

Inventor Charles B. Hodges became the first and only air car inventor in history to see his invention become a lasting commercial success. His engine was two-stage and employed an interheater between the two piston stages to warm the partially expanded compressed air with the surrounding atmosphere. A substantial gain in range-between-fill-ups was thus proven attainable with no cost for the extra fuel, which was provided by the sun